Surrendered husbands!
Househusbands - passive men who are forced to surrender their masculine authority!
Men who accept the feminine housemaid role - wives who dominate!
If he wears a maid's apron in her kitchen - what does he wear in her bed?
The supposedly modern notion of surrendered wives does in fact relate to a time when most marital arrangements were based upon one strong dominant figure - usually, but by no means always - the husband. Just as there are matriarchal and patriarchal societies and indeed countries - think of The Fatherland and The Mother Country! Marriages can be run by either sex.
The important principle to remember is simple; the partner who surrenders, should be recognized by all concerned as the weaker individual. Why should a physically strong, decisive and intelligent breadwinner be prevented from assuming the dominant role in marriage - just because she is a woman?
During the flower-power era of the late sixties a number of married couples accepted the logically of husbands surrendering their rights to the wife. Having experienced the chaos of the communes and democratic committees, most couples understood the age-old wisdom of leadership based on merit.
It was the unisex generation of the early seventies however, that introduced the additional ingredient of symbolic role swapping that involved feminizing the husband. These ideas were based on solid scientific research. A husband wearing a pink blouse would subconsciously adjust to a wife wearing a black leather jacket. It is no coincidence that this burn-your-bra feminist society introduced pink and flowered shirts to a blue and white-shirted male establishment!
Unfortunately few of the couples who over-turned the traditional husband-wife relationship were willing to explain themselves to a cynical and sneering public. These gender-swapping marital arrangements, despite being stunningly successful, were kept secret. Even friends and relatives were unaware of the activities that took place behind closed doors.
'How could I tell my father?'
Asks Jack, a surrendered husband who fully accepted his wife's request for him to wear her clothes. 'He came from a generation of men who didn't cry and never displayed their feelings. To discover that he had a son who could weep in his wife's arms after an over-the-knee spanking, for scorching her best bra, would kill him!'But wives did tell their mothers! 'I couldn't keep something like this a secret from my mother,' says Myra, who transformed her own husband into a simpering and obedient housewife. 'I couldn't have her thinking that my husband was unemployed waster! I was proud of Frank.'
Only now is the truth being told. As a new generation of enlightened wives proudly display their shy and submissive surrendered husbands we remind them of the early pioneers. About husbands who, although happy and content as apron wearing, obedient 'wives', were terrified of exposure. How could they ever sue for divorce? About wives who became control-freaks after tasting absolute unhindered power for the first time! Submissive men rendered sexually passive by women who greedily feast on their helpless feminised bodies! And the relatives from hell - mothers and sisters who are weirdly attracted to these soft, weak, vulnerable and utterly helpless she-males!
Let them describe their heart-rending, steamy and erotic experiences - to you!
'There is no such creature as a househusband,'
says Betty, 'if he looks like a wife, walks like a wife and speaks like a wife - he is a wife! The sooner you get him to accept his proper status the happier he'll be. Keep it secret from others by all means - just don't fool yourselves.'Rita agrees, 'there is no such thing as an obedient husband. The master of any house is by definition the masculine partner. The obedient partner accepts, by default, the feminine role. People who criticise the feminization process are missing the point, which is quite straightforward. If the symbolic exchange of clothing helps reinforced the real transfer of power from the male to the female then it should be encouraged.'
'I don't know why there is such a hullabaloo about a man wearing an apron.' Maude says. 'Most of the so-called feminization that accompanies role swapping is practical in nature. The rest is symbolic - and don't forget everything a woman wears symbolises her status in the home - it forcibly reminds both parties of the new relationship. I start my day by wrapping a frilly apron about Jack's waist. That clear unspoken statement reaffirms my role - and - if he's still wearing his apron when I return, he too is making a statement.'
Only in this month's issue of
- MEN AS MAIDS! - Don't miss out!***